Are you looking for legal representation? How much do you value your time and hard-earned money? Then look no further because whenever you require legal representation, the Law Offices of Vincent Miletti, Esq., the Strongest Name in Law, got your six. We are the authoritative force in Employment & Labor Law, providing diverse legal services in both a traditional and online, web-based environment, whether it be for small or large-scale businesses on a panel or a case-by-case basis. Hitherto, serving as primary counsel or cumis counsel, we are not only taking over the industry when it comes to Employment Defense and Employment Practices, but also in Intellectual Property Defense (Trademark, Copyright, and Proprietary Information), Management Side Defense, Regulatory and Compliance, Business Law & Corporate Law, and Professional Liability, among others. Whether serving directly or on behalf of a third party (EPLI, D&O, E&O), we stay unusually motivated® to take on all your needs!

You can agree with us that, at times, getting the right legal representation and finding a good attorney feels like trying to catch a fish while running away from a twenty-foot high tide, especially when time and money are of the essence and the pressure of getting results before you move too far down the rabbit hole is building up. Certainly, only when you desperately need reliable legal representation, probably not from the types of Saul Goodman, will you understand the importance of having the right attorney by your side. So, do you need an attorney with the skills and legal expertise that match your needs? Operating in Brooklyn, New York, the larger New York City, and New York State, as well as in the firm’s new office located in Astoria Queens, your life-changing encounter with Vinny Miletti Esq., the founder and owner of Miletti Law®, whose legal expertise, knowledge, and experience has grown immensely over time since the firm first opened its doors is just an email and/or a call.

Still, in addition to providing legal services, you can concur with us that information is power, and, as such, we have diligently committed ourselves to creating a range of authoritative, trustworthy, and engaging content available on our website and social media platforms. In this regard, feel free to visit and follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Yelp, and LinkedIn via the website, as well as subscribe to our Blog, YouTube Channel, and News Letter through https://milettilaw.com/blog and https://www.youtube.com/@MilettiLaw, and https://milettilaw.com/#7665b240-0790-4562-ac0f-9444f9f5165a, respectively, to enjoy such content aimed to keep our unusually motivated® readers informed about how diverse legal issues affect them and/or their businesses.

Accordingly, this blog is Part V of our series, “Key Workplace Policies and Employee Handbooks.” In Part IV, we reviewed the requirements of New York law when it comes to sexual harassment training for employees and mentioned that as codified under N.Y. Lab. Law § 201-g(2), employers in the state of New York are mandated to provide their employees with training on how to prevent sexual harassment. We also added that pursuant to this statute, the training must (1) include information concerning options for remedies, (2) explain sexual harassment in detail, (3) include examples of unlawful conduct, and (4) be interactive.

To move this discussion forward, this blog is titled “Inclusion of a Disability Policy in Employee Handbooks” and is Part IV of the series in which we have reviewed what New York law says about including a policy concerning workers with disabilities in employee handbooks.

Inclusion of a Disability Policy in Employee Handbooks

Today, the U.S. has made great strides in protecting individuals living and working with disabilities. For instance, the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act), as codified under 42 U.S.C. § 12112(b)(5), prohibits discrimination against any employee who (1) has a disability, (2) is a qualified individual, and (3) who has the ability to perform a job’s essential functions with or without a reasonable accommodation. As we have discussed in our past blogs, disabilities covered by the ADA include(1) a physical or mental impairment that has a substantial limitation on one or more major activities of life, (2) being regarded as having such an impairment, and (3) a record of having such an impairment.

In fact, “disability” is one of the classes protected under (1) the New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL), (2) the New York Equal Pay Act (effective as of October 8, 2019), and (3) the New York State Human Rights Law (NYSHRL). This implies that employers must remain compliant with what the law requires when it comes to employees with disabilities. Among other things, employers in New York are required to ensure that a policy on such employees has been included in their employee handbooks.

As codified under N.Y. Exec. Law § 296, the policy is required to expressly note that the employer is compliant with the NYSHRL, through which covered employers in the state are prohibited from declining or rejecting to provide reasonable accommodations to employee’s known disabilities. Indeed, as provided for under the NYC Administrative Code § 8-107, subd. 15(a), employers are mandated by the NYCHRL to provide an unpaid intern and employees with a reasonable accommodation so that such an individual can satisfy a job’s essential requirements, given that the employer knows about the disability or the disability is known.

However, while they should not impose undue hardships on employees, as set forth under N.Y. Exec. Law § 292, measures taken by employers to enable employees with disabilities to fulfill the duties of their jobs are known as reasonable accommodations. As provided for under N.Y. Exec. Law § 292(21), an employer is mandated by the NYSHRL to provide reasonable accommodation to an employee with a disability. We also added that under N.Y. Exec. Law § 292(21-e), “reasonable accommodation” implies taking steps that, while not imposing undue hardship on how the employer conducts business, would allow an employee with a disability to perform the duties of their job reasonably.

However, this goes without saying that if the accommodation would impose an undue hardship upon the employer, as provided for under N.Y. Exec. Law § 296(3)(b) of the NYSHRL, an employer may refuse to provide an employee with a disability with an accommodation. Nonetheless, the law provides a range of factors that may determine whether an employer should provide an accommodation or not and the reasonability of the accommodation itself, including (1) the reasonability or convenience of the accommodation for the employer, (2) the effects it has on other employees and the problems, costs, and hardships it will cause for the employer, and (3) the benefit or efficacy the accommodation provides in eliminating the performance impediments that the disability causes.

As usual, stay tuned for more legal guidance, training, and education. In the interim, if there are any questions or comments, please let us know at the Contact Us page!

Always Rising Above the Bar,

Isaac T.,

Legal Writer, Author, and Publisher.