Are you looking for legal representation? How much do you value your time and hard-earned money? Then look no further because whenever you require legal representation, the Law Offices of Vincent Miletti, Esq., the Strongest Name in Law, got your six. We are the authoritative force in Employment & Labor Law, providing diverse legal services in both a traditional and online, web-based environment, whether it be for small or large-scale businesses on a panel or a case-by-case basis. Hitherto, serving as primary counsel or cumis counsel, we are not only taking over the industry when it comes to Employment Defense and Employment Practices, but also in Intellectual Property Defense (Trademark, Copyright, and Proprietary Information), Management Side Defense, Regulatory and Compliance, Business Law & Corporate Law, and Professional Liability, among others. Whether serving directly or on behalf of a third party (EPLI, D&O, E&O), we stay unusually motivated® to take on all your needs!

You can agree with us that, at times, getting the right legal representation and finding a good attorney feels like trying to catch a fish while running away from a twenty-foot high tide, especially when time and money are of the essence and the pressure of getting results before you move too far down the rabbit hole is building up. Certainly, only when you desperately need reliable legal representation, probably not from the types of Saul Goodman, will you understand the importance of having the right attorney by your side. So, do you need an attorney with the skills and legal expertise that match your needs? Operating in Brooklyn, New York, the larger New York City, and New York State, as well as in the firm’s new office located in Astoria Queens, your life-changing encounter with Vinny Miletti Esq., the founder and owner of Miletti Law®, whose legal expertise, knowledge, and experience has grown immensely over time since the firm first opened its doors is just an email and/or a call.

Still, in addition to providing legal services, you can concur with us that information is power, and, as such, we have diligently committed ourselves to creating a range of authoritative, trustworthy, and engaging content available on our website and social media platforms. In this regard, feel free to visit and follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Yelp, and LinkedIn via the website, as well as subscribe to our Blog, YouTube Channel, and News Letter through https://milettilaw.com/blog and https://www.youtube.com/@MilettiLaw, and https://milettilaw.com/#7665b240-0790-4562-ac0f-9444f9f5165a, respectively, to enjoy such content aimed to keep our unusually motivated® readers informed about how diverse legal issues affect them and/or their businesses.

In this regard, this blog is Part XXIX of our series, “Key Employment Law Issues for Businesses & Companies in New York.” In Part XXVIII, we reviewed the concept of confidentiality and why it may be included when drafting restrictive covenants and mentioned that employers should use confidentiality agreements as a way of preventing former and current employees from divulging or misappropriating confidential information or trade secrets. We also added that in order to ensure that all the information being sought to be protected has been included, employers should make sure that the term “confidential information” has been comprehensively and appropriately defined.

In our next blog titled “Addressing Discrimination Claims when Signing Contractual Covenants,” we have provided insight into how to address discrimination claims, an issue that may arise when employees are required to sign contractual covenants.

Addressing Discrimination Claims when Signing Contractual Covenants

To address the problem that discrimination claims may arise as a result of contractual covenants, employers should consider what the law says about two, among other critical issues, including “non-disclosure provisions” and “confidential settlements.”

As mentioned above, employers should be aware of what the law says about “non-disclosure provisions.” Usually, employers and employees may, depending on the industry and nature of employment, sign several agreements and agree to various provisions as a normal routine in employment contracts.

However, it is critical for employers to understand that pursuant to N.Y. Gen. Oblig. Law § 5-336(2), the law requires employees or potential employees to be notified that an employment agreement or contract provision, entered into on or after January 1, 2020, does not prevent them from cooperating with law enforcement or participating in an investigation with (1) a self-retained attorney duly permitted and admitted to practice law, (2) a local human rights commission, (3) the New York State Division of Human Rights, (4) or the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).

This implies that based on provisions of this statute mentioned above, any agreement or contract provision entered before the date mentioned above and through which an employee or a potential hire is prevented from disclosing factual information related to any future discrimination claim will be rendered unenforceable and void by courts.

Additionally, employers should also be aware of the legal issues surrounding the confidentiality of settlement agreements. For instance, pursuant to N.Y. Gen. Oblig. § 5-336, if an underlying claim has a factual foundation involving laws on discrimination specific to New York, employers are prohibited, when entering into a settlement agreement, from requiring employees to sign a non-disclosure clause.

However, the statute also provides an exception, which concerns a situation where the preference of the complainant is confidentiality. Under the statute, if confidentiality is the preference, the complainant is required to memorize, through a written agreement, the confidentiality preference, as well as have a mandatory 3 weeks to consider the condition of non-disclosure. Complainants must understand that while the 3-week window cannot be waived, the preference agreement should be a separate agreement. Nonetheless, the carveout is that the complainant may, within seven days of execution, revoke and, maybe, change or do away with the agreement concerning their preference.

In Part XXX of this series and our blog titled “Whistleblowing Exceptions in Contractual Covenants/Agreements,” we will discuss how to address discrimination claims that may arise when employers require employees to sign confidentiality covenants at the point of hiring and onboarding employees.

As usual, stay tuned for more legal guidance, training, and education. In the interim, if there are any questions or comments, please let us know at the Contact Us page!

Always Rising Above the Bar,

Isaac T.,

Legal Writer, Author, and Publisher.