Are you looking for legal representation? How much do you value your time and hard-earned money? Then look no further because whenever you require legal representation, the Law Offices of Vincent Miletti, Esq., the Strongest Name in Law, got your six. We are the authoritative force in Employment & Labor Law, providing diverse legal services in both a traditional and online, web-based environment, whether it be for small or large-scale businesses on a panel or a case-by-case basis. Hitherto, serving as primary counsel or cumis counsel, we are not only taking over the industry when it comes to Employment Defense and Employment Practices, but also in Intellectual Property Defense (Trademark, Copyright, and Proprietary Information), Management Side Defense, Regulatory and Compliance, Business Law & Corporate Law, and Professional Liability, among others. Whether serving directly or on behalf of a third party (EPLI, D&O, E&O), we stay unusually motivated® to take on all your needs!
You can agree with us that, at times, getting the right legal representation and finding a good attorney feels like trying to catch a fish while running away from a twenty-foot-high tide, especially when time and money are of the essence and the pressure of getting results before you move too far down the rabbit hole is building up. Certainly, only when you desperately need reliable legal representation, probably not from the types of Saul Goodman, will you understand the importance of having the right attorney by your side. So, do you need an attorney with the skills and legal expertise that match your needs? Operating in Brooklyn, New York, the larger New York City, and New York State, as well as in the firm’s new office located in Astoria Queens, your life-changing encounter with Vinny Miletti Esq., the founder and owner of Miletti Law®, whose legal expertise, knowledge, and experience has grown immensely over time since the firm first opened its doors is just an email and/or a call.
Still, in addition to providing legal services, you can concur with us that information is power, and, as such, we have diligently committed ourselves to creating a range of authoritative, trustworthy, and engaging content available on our website and social media platforms. In this regard, feel free to visit and follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Yelp, and LinkedIn via the website, as well as subscribe to our Blog, YouTube Channel, and News Letter through https://milettilaw.com/blog and https://www.youtube.com/@MilettiLaw, and https://milettilaw.com/#7665b240-0790-4562-ac0f-9444f9f5165a, respectively, to enjoy such content aimed to keep our unusually motivated® readers informed about how diverse legal issues affect them and/or their businesses.
In this regard, this blog is Part XXV of our series, “Key Employment Law Issues for Businesses & Companies in New York.” In Part XXIV, we reviewed “blue penciling” and “sufficient consideration,” which are key concepts of critical importance for employers when drafting restrictive covenants and entering into non-compete agreements. Regarding the first concept, we mentioned that employers should understand that courts in New York may, commonly referred to as blue-penciling in the legal arena, delete, narrow, or modify an unreasonable or overbroad restriction to make it enforceable. However, courts are also at will to decline the blue-penciling of provisions and restrictions they deem to be overreaching. Concerning the second concept, we said that while the law in New York requires an employer and an employee to have entered into an arrangement where either side provides something of value noticeable and recognizable by courts, an employment arrangement attains sufficient consideration when a restrictive covenant or a non-compete is signed at the start of employment.
In our next blog titled “Forfeiture-for-Competition Provision in Hiring & Onboarding,” we have moved the discussion forward by hammering on the provision of “forfeiture-for-competition” – another key concept of consideration for employers and employees during the process of hiring and boarding.
Forfeiture-for-Competition in Hiring & Onboarding New Employees
Forfeiture-for-competition is another key employment provision permissible under the law that significantly impacts non-compete agreements and restrictive covenants between employers and employees. Through the provision of forfeiture-for-competition, employees are given a choice – retain employment benefits by staying with the employer or forfeit a prospective benefit by competing with the employer.
Ideally, there are several things that employers should understand when it comes to this provision. Firstly, competition is not prohibited through the provision of forfeiture-for-competition. Secondly, this provision provides employees with a choice, as mentioned above. Thirdly, as long as the employer can show that the employee was discharged with an identifiable cause or that the employer was willing to employ the employee who agreed not to compete, the provision is enforced by courts irrespective of its reasonableness. Finally, given the eligibility of an employee to be provided with compensation following the termination of employment, then the provision of forfeiture-for-competition might be a consideration for an employer.
In Part XXVI of this series, we will, in our blog titled “Considerations when Drafting & Enforcing Non-solicitation Clauses,” hammer on other key issues of consideration for employers when drafting and enforcing non-solicitation clauses.
As usual, stay tuned for more legal guidance, training, and education. In the interim, if there are any questions or comments, please let us know at the Contact Us page!
Always Rising Above the Bar,
Isaac T.,
Legal Writer, Author, and Publisher.